Brain-storming on the

Family Employment Program (FEP):

Verbatim Recording of Responses


Group One

Successes Future Goals
Time lines Opportunity to earn back spent time on TANF-earn back the months
Assisting people with disabilities emphasis and assistive technology Medicaid buy-in, continue with health insurance and work
Modeling that going to work provides to youth-doing well in school More ability to continue education without penalty, include education as a work activity
Proven record of moving from welfare to work activities Sheltered transition for those who need support to enter into self-sufficiency work activities, i.e., mental health/emotional issues at young age
Housing-safe, secure-opportunity to become successful, including transitional housing to rental to home ownership Expiring contracts-keep on affordable basis. Continue affordable housing projects. Be more realistic in purchasing and assessing value
Met goals of moving people out of welfare Flexible enough-one size does not fit all, i.e., those underemployed. Basic services for while people are gaining education and training. "Education is the key." What is the path?
Extension of Medicaid as people first go to work Make Medicaid resource available through employers to EES
Ability to enforce school attendance. Both TANF and housing can do this-getting youth to school Keep in-and inform parents. Reinforce opportunity of children's attendance
Some people in ethnic communities are accessing services Enhance Earned Income Credit (EIC)-outreach to ethnic minority people on services.
Domestic Violence option How to make TANF more holistic, include culturally competent

More training on domestic violence with workers for good assessment
Assets-ability to own, i.e., cars PASS Plan as in SSI-use in TANF. Implement plan to achieve self-sufficiency

Group Two

Successes Future Goals
More experience with reforming Better collaboration at all levels
Universal participation Measure success by long-term measures
Higher education counts in Utah Consensus on success measures-more than reducing rolls
Utah has reduced numbers on roles Develop capacity to increase wages-integrate training with employment
Appreciation of need for support Expand concept of Individual Development Account
Flexibility Explore how individual can take advantage of self-employment
Individual planning How to measure success in small business enterprise
Integrated funding stream, i.e., training Explore how practices can be changed to enhance self-employment options
Collaboration at all levels-legislative, Executive, local, national Incentivize the system
Legislation requires follow-up studies High education should become a more visible option
Improvements in child care and child support MOE funds go to support individual in school not "on the clock"
More decision making on state level Attitude change about recipient: caseworkers, administrators, legislators

Lower staff to customer ratio-improve relationship training and skills of workers

Need more specialists, not so many generalists

Change 3 year limit to 5 years

20% exemption-change base to larger base-new formula

Improve child care/child support/food stamps

Seamless process from secondary to community college to university

Allow person to receive pell grant

Direct pass-through of child support

Performance standards-employment retention and wage levels on longer term

Better transportation to access jobs

Make definitions consistent across programs-WIA, TANF-e.g., family, also consistent program outcomes

Policy-makers look at long term implications of policies

Don't assume there is an ongoing collective experience-educate them

Emphasize prevention/early intervention

Dispel myths about recipients-before elections-of general public

Personalize message about benefits to society (e.g., Jillynn)

Consider housing, transportation needs, etc.

What is our priority? Stay focused

Public education about the problem

Stories are important-investment angle

Put in context of impact on children-hope, self-sufficiency

Allow person to receive pell grant

Group Three

Successes Future Goals
Focus on increasing income and broad definition of "participation" Living wage/make work pay
Focus on employment State (Utah citizens) pick up more of the burden/diminish the role of federal government
State flexibility Maintain role of federal government
Time limit and exceptions/exemptions Remove sales tax from food
Broader focus on individual's goals Emphasize education/training
Maintaining investment despite caseload reductions View welfare as an investment in people
Child care more flexible, both in policy and funding Make time limits more flexible

Allow assistance for illegal immigrants

Expanded state flexibility-broader definition of "participation"

Focus on increased income versus caseload reduction

Include participation in barrier reducing activities as allowable participation

Broaden focus to include working poor

Welfare leavers need better access to health care and other work supports (transportation, food stamps, child care, etc.)

Resources for education

Expand assistance/services for males in order to increase earning capacity through education and training

Expand services to childless adults

Expand supported employment services for "multiple barrier" individuals (especially mental health)

Maintain TANF funding level

Combine/integrate focus on welfare and economic development, job creation, etc.

Involve businesses, especially small business, to identify barriers to better employment

Look at entire ecology of welfare to focus on individual needs-less formulaic responses

More training/accountability for caseworkers

Balance emphasis on marriage with emphasis on capacity of single mother

Support "marriage success"

Strong evaluation of marriage policies (don't make money the carrot/stick for staying in a potentially unsafe marriage

Strengthen "diversity" of system to meet a broad range of needs

Simplify access to a broad range of services

Streamline eligibility/requirements

Clarify definitions of words (investment, living wage, etc.) To allow more "real discussions/consensus

Group Four

Successes Future Goals
Ongoing dialogue between cross section of interest Education of legislators
National organizations more inclusive of smaller non-profits-giving more voice Education on supportive services for policy-makers and the general public
More parents working Expanding need for more supportive services
More individual planning on employment plans Clearer messages on transitional benefits
Self-sufficiency standard specific to Utah-has been developed Need for more consumer input on case planning and policy
Utah is a leader in "welfare to work" research, policy development, and innovation Self-sufficiency standard to be used as a tool
DWS administration listens well to consumer input Streamlining and coordination of all federal programs-food stamps, Medicaid, housing
GED focus More recognition of the special needs population
DWS Social Skills Development classes Remove or raise the 20 percent exemption
DWS has a good employer relationship and knows what type of skill sets are needed Options for states-"pausing the clock"

Simplify/streamline application for food stamps

Inadequate benefits

More discussion on housing in relation to welfare reform

Child Protective Services/Division of Child and Family Services issues

Need for more Spanish-speaking workers

Greater understanding of cultural differences

Be politically active of statewide issues of cultural competency, mental health parity, etc.

Education/vocational training counted as a work activity

Better access to DWS Social Skills Development

Job retention-states rewarded for job retention, increased earnings

Living wage

Better training to prepare FEP clients for high tech jobs

Socialized medicine

Group Five

Successes Future Goals
Education works We can do even better
Child care subsidies Better tracking of former welfare recipients (identify success stories better)
More individual attention works Actual poverty reduction
Effective mentoring Child support is income support-get more of what we collect into children's direct services
Honest, open dialogue is effective Retain flexibility to allow individual attention

Increase community partnerships

Extending "use" of child care funding beyond 10-12 year range

Long-term solutions to broad population/ investment in future, e.g., G.I. Bill

Combat obstacles and decrease difficulty of "getting out" of the system

Are new jobs being created as viable, long-term opportunities?

Increase availability for education-must be focus

Partnerships with Indian tribes; local entities

Build more effective "infrastructure" for local entities and have better trained individuals to run these infrastructures

Better address urban/rural disconnect

Addressing multiple barriers/family crisis

Find effective solutions for those outside educational advancement

Address the perpetually needy in more effective/meaningful ways

Federal Poverty Level needs to be evaluated/recalculated according to genuine self-sufficiency

Reduce social stigmas/negative perceptions of welfare recipients

More honor and respect for women and elderly

Group Six

Successes Future Goals
Time limits Sensitivity to culture, language, and other challenges
Focus on families and children-child focus Streamlined paper process (Turbo Tax model)
Education and training More visible transition of employment support for parents to keep their jobs
Focus on work Time limits-extension criteria clarification, understanding, flexibility
More integration of programs and services (federal and state) Data collection, especially on people who leave the system
Flexibility to put resources where needed Increased knowledge, communication about where to go and what to do when parent hits time limit
Case management and caseworkers Community resources-people are stumped about how to access systems and programs
It works-fewer cases Continual training of caseworkers on resources available to families
Increased child support enforcement- consistent enforcement Higher education goals to improve and increase income
State administered, rather than 20 county systems Increase access to mental health and substance abuse programs and services
Increased awareness for need and quality improvement of child care Start holding states accountable for outcomes, not participation rates
Flexibility and money to use for child care College tuition (pool of money)-incentives (tax, future work services), loans, grants, service, scholarships
Prevent of factors that put at risk-unwed pregnancy, low education, limited career choices Prevention of risk factors-start early, in public schools

More "integration" and coordination among departmental agencies, i.e., Department of Health, Workforce Services, state, federal, county, city

Streamline customer notification of their rights

Expand immigrant services-better, clearer understanding of services available

Maintain and expand medical services

Expand eligibility to use child care

Expand child care services

"Turbo Tax" model-multi-language, disability, Smart systems

Focus on mission, rather than bureaucracy

Take away fear

Make schools safer

Prevent abuse

C:\WRRRT\AppEfepgroups.wpd